Is Adegen Worth Trying? A Reader Question Answered

Adegen continues to attract plenty of discussion among people looking for ways to tackle hair loss. Our original article, published in 2020, remains one of our most visited posts, with a lengthy comments section containing both positive and negative experiences.

But beyond the debate, there is a practical question: is Adegen worth trying?

Our view is that the range contains legitimate medical treatment options, but its pricing deserves scrutiny. It may suit someone who wants a coordinated routine from one provider. It is less convincing for someone whose priority is affordability—or avoiding medication.

What does Adegen offer?

Adegen’s current range includes shampoos, scalp tools, topical treatments and oral medication. Its website lists oral finasteride and minoxidil, alongside minoxidil-based topical formulas with optional finasteride or dutasteride. It therefore needs to be assessed as a range that includes medical treatments, rather than simply a collection of cosmetic hair products.

That distinction matters. Buying a shampoo or scalp brush is a different decision from starting a medicine, even when both are presented as parts of the same hair-care system.

Can the treatments work?

There is a reasonable basis for expecting some of the medication options to help suitable users. Finasteride and minoxidil are established treatments for male pattern hair loss, recognised by the NHS. They do not work for everyone, and continued use is generally needed to maintain their benefits.

It would therefore be unfair to dismiss the entire Adegen range as ineffective. Equally, the presence of recognised medicines does not establish that the complete Adegen system performs better than less expensive treatment options.

The important distinction is between evidence for an active ingredient and evidence that a particular branded formula offers additional benefits. Buyers should consider both before paying a premium.

The main question is value for money

For us, price is the biggest reservation.

For example, at the time of checking, Adegen’s ARB Topical A15 was advertised at $79 for a 30-day supply, or $199 for a 90-day supply. This is a compounded formula containing 15% minoxidil and additional ingredients, so it is not a direct equivalent of a standard 5% minoxidil product. Nevertheless, it represents a substantial ongoing expense.

There are considerably cheaper routes to established hair-loss medication. As one UK example, Dr Fox lists 84 generic finasteride 1mg tablets for £26.50. Oxford Online Pharmacy lists three 60ml bottles of Sons topical minoxidil 5% solution for £53.98. Prices, consultation charges and delivery costs can change.

These examples are not exact substitutes for every Adegen formulation, and UK and US prices are not directly interchangeable. They do, however, show why it is sensible to compare other pharmacies before committing to a premium treatment programme.

Compare the medicine, strength, formulation, quantity and clinical support—not just the brand name or headline price. A higher price does not, by itself, establish a better result.

Does the complete routine justify the extra cost?

Some people prefer having their products, instructions and treatment service in one place. That convenience can have value, particularly if it helps them follow an appropriate routine consistently.

However, not everyone needs every product in a branded system. A shampoo, brush and roller should each be assessed on their own merits, rather than assumed to be essential because they are sold alongside medication.

The question to ask is straightforward: what am I getting for the additional money, and is it something I actually need?

If the answer is mainly branding or convenience, you may decide that a simpler approach offers better value. If a particular formulation is clinically appropriate for you, that deserves a discussion with the prescribing professional.

What if you want to avoid medication?

If your aim is to avoid minoxidil, finasteride and other medicines, Adegen’s medication-based options are not a suitable match for that preference.

A topical treatment is still a medicine when it contains medicinal ingredients. Applying it to the scalp does not make it a drug-free alternative.

Adegen also sells shampoo and scalp tools, but these should not be assumed to reproduce the benefits of its medical treatments. Likewise, choosing a non-medical product elsewhere does not guarantee that it will control pattern hair loss.

Before buying, check the exact ingredients in the product you are considering. The range contains different options, and they should not all be treated as interchangeable.

Consider suitability as well as cost

Medication decisions should include potential side effects, your medical history and the cause of your hair loss. Finasteride can cause side effects, including sexual problems and mood changes, while minoxidil also has risks that vary with its formulation and route of use. A clinician or pharmacist can help assess whether a particular treatment is appropriate.

An expensive treatment that does not suit you is poor value, regardless of its branding.

Our verdict: a credible treatment range, but compare prices first

Adegen should not be dismissed simply because it charges premium prices. Its range includes recognised medical treatments, and some buyers may appreciate the convenience of its combined approach.

However, we would compare other pharmacy options before committing. Access to established hair-loss medication does not necessarily require an expensive branded system, and any claimed advantage should be assessed separately from the reputation of its active ingredients.

If you are comfortable using medication, Adegen is one option to investigate—but affordability remains a valid concern. If you want to avoid medication, its medical treatment options do not fit that goal.

Our assessment: a range with legitimate treatment options, but a substantial price tag that deserves careful comparison.

For the earlier discussion and reader experiences, see our original Adegen article.